Samsung galaxy s5 iphone 5s is better. Which is better: iPhone or Galaxy? Fingerprint scanner and other sensors

Market mobile devices is increasing rapidly every day. We constantly hear about new models released by one or another developer that have some special features and functions.

Tellingly, the list of well-known devices includes both representatives of the Chinese market from small and little-known companies, as well as products of mobile industry giants, two industry leaders. Have you guessed what we are talking about? We give a hint: these are brands that generate disputes about which is better - "Samsung" or "iPhone". In this article, we are talking about two companies representing different areas of the mobile industry - the Korean concern Samsung and the American miracle - Apple.

Competitors?

Let's start, perhaps, with the fact that we will indicate why these two concerns compete with each other. Why don't we say that Lenovo intends to "kill" Apple with its next product? Agree, this opposition applies exclusively to the Korean manufacturer. And this is not an accident.

At one time, after the iPhone went on sale, the first manufacturer to copy the design of the novelty and begin developing its lineup was Samsung. This is the company that, roughly speaking, “declared war” on the Americans back in 2007-2008, when “apple” devices were only gaining popularity. And, what is most interesting, the iPhone Samsung managed to copy so high quality that their sales skyrocketed.

There was only one small nuance left - positioned Samsung devices in the category of budget devices, while Apple equipment was sold exclusively at premium prices. This happened until the Korean giant began to gradually enter the class of premium phones, releasing its flagships.

Therefore, today, speaking about which is better - "Samsung" or "iPhone", you need to understand that specific models are meant, and not just any gadget of Korean origin, compared with latest iPhone, namely the flagship - the latest generation of Samsung Galaxy S, for example. Only these devices can be comparable to what Apple releases.

Criteria

If we are talking about finding out which is better - iPhone 6 or Samsung C6, respectively, we need to immediately decide on the evaluation criteria. After all, by themselves, both models are quite highly valued among fans - they are among the highest quality smartphones on the market, have the most advanced features, and so on. It is impossible to say that one of the models is bad and the other is good, since both have a lot of advantages. Another thing is to make a certain vector, according to which we will make a comparison. Further, following it, we will put an assessment.

In this article, we will determine which is better - Samsung or iPhone, according to different categories. You can see them below. It should be noted right away that we will be based on various customer reviews, so as not to be unfounded.

Build quality

Let's start with the classic question of how the model was assembled and what its body is like. Since we are talking about top devices, fortunately, there are problems with backlash back cover or loose fit of any other parts, they do not occur. Both models are assembled on the highest level. True, if we take into account comparative reviews, then the iPhone 6 allegedly lies in the hand more conveniently and more pleasantly than the Korean device. Again, perhaps this is a subjective assessment, but it is not uncommon to find it in the comments.

Work stability

You can also determine which is better - "Samsung" or "iPhone" by the criterion of stability. It determines how rarely the device freezes, slows down, and other annoyances that annoy the user.

As far as we all know, Samsung has the reputation of not being the strongest device developer in terms of the stability of the latter. However, as experience with the Galaxy S6 shows, the Koreans have done quite well in this sense. The device works like clockwork, although it consumes more software resources than the iPhone. This is because the operating iOS system more balanced than Hardware with which Samsung is offered. However, this does not prevent you from working comfortably with either one or the other, therefore, in this matter, preference cannot be given to one of the models.

True, if you put the question in a different way: which is better - the iPhone 5S or the fifth generation Samsung, then it will no longer be possible to give an unambiguous answer here. There is information that on earlier models it was possible to clearly lead the "apple" brand.

Software

The phones we are comparing use completely different platforms. For example, Samsung ships on the basis of the Android operating system, while Apple operates on the basis of Apple's own product - iOS.

These are two completely different systems, each of which has both a number of advantages and disadvantages. In general, of course, iOS is more user-oriented. It is easier to handle, although it has a slightly truncated compared to Android functionality. It is believed that Samsung is more comfortable to work with for people who like to customize the system settings for themselves. Samsung phones allow you to do this.

Hardware

On another issue - technical support and hardware configuration - making a choice is also not so simple. According to some parameters, for example, the quality of the camera, processor, and some other nodes, the iPhone clearly wins. At the same time, the Korean giant also demonstrates the excellent performance of its products: the quality of images, for example, taken on an iPhone or Samsung Galaxy, does not differ so much from each other. Photos that both categories of devices can boast of are already of high quality.

As for the optimization of the processor, battery consumption, sensor response and a number of other points, it is very difficult to notice the difference between phones at the level of a simple user. Again, this is due to the high quality of materials and assembly of both devices.

Price

Well, it's time to compare the cost of iPhone and Samsung phones. A comparison of other aspects of the functioning of the models showed that the difference between the devices is not so significant, and it lies, first of all, in a different approach to the user. At the same time, both devices can become a source of pride for the manufacturing company.

Traditionally, Samsung products have been considered cheaper than the reputed Apple products. And this is normal, because everyone has long known that the owners of "apple" devices overpay for the brand. And this can be traced even on modern devices: the most new samsung The 32 GB Galaxy S6 will cost almost 36 thousand rubles, while the 16 GB iPhone 6 costs all 46 thousand. But there is also the iPhone 6 Plus, the price of which is even higher.

conclusions

The comparison showed that both devices are modern, powerful and attractive phones in every sense, capable of solving the tasks assigned to them. The difference is only in the execution and approach to the consumer: those who are already used to working with Android will be delighted with the new Galaxy, and, conversely, "apple lovers" will love the new gadget from Apple.

So, in a sense, it makes no sense to make such comparisons - both devices have approximately the same capabilities.

Sooner or later, each of us thinks about buying a new smartphone, which should satisfy all our requirements. There are a huge number of all kinds of gadgets on the mobile device market, among which the world-famous iPhone 5 and Samsung Galaxy S IV can be distinguished.

These gadget models were developed by some of the most popular phone manufacturers in the world. Modern smartphone giants are constantly competing for a place in the sun and customer loyalty. Let's analyze a number of factors to find a winner.

Criteria for comparing iPhone 5 and Samsung Galaxy S4

Frame

If someone does not know about all the potential capabilities of a Samsung smartphone, then at the first glance at the phone case, no one will be able to think that this gadget is one of the most powerful that have ever been presented on the market.

Body Material Galaxy S IV- plastic.

Material iPhone cases 5 - anodized aluminium.

Conclusion: according to this criterion, the smartphone from Apple is the absolute leader, because the quality of the case material is much superior to its competitor.

Screen size

An important factor in the choice is the screen size. Some smartphone owners believe that the screen should not be too big. Others are of the opinion that the larger the screen, the better. Despite the larger screen size of the Samsung phone, it is very difficult to give preference to any model. Everyone must decide for himself which one suits him best.

Galaxy S IV screen size- 140.1 x 71.8 x 7.7 mm.

iPhone 5 screen size- 123, x 58.57 x 7.6 mm.

Conclusion: making a choice between these gadgets, just take each of them in your hands and choose the one that is more convenient for you. By this criterion, it is impossible to determine the leader.

Display

The Galaxy S IV not only has a larger display, but also a larger extension than its hardcore rival from server America. It should be noted that the screen density of the iPhone 5 is higher than that of the Galaxy S IV and is 441 ppi and 326 ppi, respectively. But will this indicator be visible to the naked eye? Of course not. In addition, the difference in pixels is also not noticeable. The only thing that a potential buyer will be able to notice is only the size of the display.

Galaxy S IV display specifications- 4.9′ 1920×1080.

iPhone 5 display specifications- 4′ 1136 × 640 Retina Display.

Conclusion: according to this criterion, the absolute leader is the model from the South Korean manufacturer Samsung, which was able to surpass Apple both in display size and in the number of pixels.

The weight

According to this criterion, it is impossible to compare these models, because they differ significantly in size. It should be noted that the new Samsung model is lighter than the previous one, but the iPhone is still significantly superior to its competitor.

Galaxy S IV Weight— 138

iPhone 5 weight- 112

Conclusion: In this criterion, the iPhone outperforms the new Samsung.

Memory

The Galaxy S IV has 64 GB of storage. In addition, the phone has the ability to expand the memory using microSD cards. The new iPhone does not have a memory expansion function, which is not a plus.

Storage capacity Galaxy S IV- 16/32/64 GB.

iPhone 5 storage capacity- 16/32/64 GB.

Conclusion: according to this criterion, Galaxy is the absolute leader.

CPU

Based on many special tests various models phones, we can safely say that the absolute leader in processor power is the Galaxy S IV. But does the phone need such power? It is difficult to answer this question, because the vast majority of programs are able to run any gadget.

Galaxy S IV Processor Power– 1.8 GHz.

iPhone 5 processor power– 1.3 GHz.

Conclusion: With fantastic power and performance, Samsung phone is much better than iPhone 5.

RAM

According to this criterion, the higher the OP indicator, the better. The new Galaxy has an undeniable advantage in this indicator, which significantly outperforms all its competitors.

Galaxy S IV RAM- 2 GB.

iPhone 5 RAM- 1 GB.

Conclusion: Looking at the number of OPs of each phone, we can safely say that the new Samsung phone has an advantage over the new iPhone in this criterion.

Camera

A definite plus will also be the number of pixels in the new Samsung models in front of its eternal competitor from Apple, which does not guarantee best quality pictures. However, the Galaxy S IV has a lot of useful features, such as Dual Camera, Drama Shot and Sound & Shot.

Qualitative characteristics of the Galaxy S IV camera- 13 megapixels.

Qualitative characteristics iPhone cameras 5 - 8 megapixels.

Conclusions: the leader in this category is the new development of Samsung.

Networking

Both ultra-modern devices have similar network capabilities. According to this criterion, there is no significant difference between the Galaxy S IV and iPhone 5. For this reason, this factor is not decisive when choosing a phone.

Battery

Samsung is the leader in this indicator, but it should be noted that the large display and eight-core processor will consume significantly more energy than the iPhone. How long the new Samsung can really work before it is completely discharged is still unknown. This issue will become clearer with the appearance of the first reviews. Therefore, it is not yet possible to identify a leader by this criterion.

Peculiarities

First of all, it should be noted that the Galaxy S IV functions with the help of the new version the most popular Android operating system. This makes it possible to access many different applications using Google Play. In the new Galaxy versions the revolutionary S Voice feature has appeared, with the help of which it becomes possible to control the phone using your voice. But it's really not that revolutionary. given function. Apple has long been able to implement a similar Siri technology.

When implementing a new development, Samsung tried to make its next gadget as functional as possible with the help of a mass of built-in applications. In the same time new iPhone approached the issue more conservatively. It is obviously difficult to reproach Apple developers with stuffing.

Briefly about the main thing in the Galaxy S IV– added voice control, last android version, the introduction of the S Translate function to communicate in various foreign languages.

Briefly about the main thing in the iPhone 5- the company has a conservative approach to the implementation of the new version of the smartphone.

Conclusion: Galaxy S IV leads the way with unique features.

Summing up

Both phones from well-known manufacturers have a lot of positive and negative points. It should be noted that Samsung is trying to introduce unique unique features into its designs. According to some criteria for comparing new phone models, the Galaxy S IV was undoubtedly the leader, but in the vast majority of cases, the iPhone 5 is not inferior to its competitor. Which gadget is better? Having studied the above materials, everyone will be able to independently give an answer.

Let's try to answer a prosaic question: what is better iPhone or Samsung?

Smartphone manufacturers like to call their offspring alphanumeric combinations. The combination of the serial number of the model and the letter S is especially popular.

Competing manufacturers are also noted for this hobby. Samsung and Apple smartphones .

The difference between the sizes of the fifth models is striking, especially when they are in hand.

Despite the large dimensions of Korean phones, Californian ones are always somewhat slimmer. The iPhone 5s is almost 2 mm thinner than the competitor, and the 6 is one.

However, this circumstance is hidden by the rounded edges of Samsung. Because of this, they visually look thinner.

In terms of weight ratio, the difference between the fives is striking - 13 grams. The Apple device is, of course, lighter. But for models of the sixth generation, the difference in weight is 9 grams.

It is noteworthy that of all the phones described, only one (Samsung Galaxy S5) has a removable back cover.

The sixth model of the Korean galactic flagship has acquired a one-piece body.

In the sixth Galaxy model, engineers decided to abandon not only the removable cover, but also plastic. Now the device is protected from all sides Gorilla glass 4.

The "apples", as always, aluminum.

The assembly of all devices is solid, but the Galaxy S5 has also become dustproof.

For “apples”, a high-quality assembly is the standard, but the S6 is the first monolithic device from a Korean company.

In terms of build quality and materials used, the sixth models are equal, and the fifth “Korean” is somewhat inferior to the device from Apple of the same generation.

Note! iPhone more prone to slipping out of the palm of both the fifth and sixth. And if in the fifth this is compensated by compactness, then the sixth strives to “jump” out of his hands. Samsung is fine with that.

Battle on displays

The screens of all phones are good (even the fifth models). There is nothing specific to compare. Data on their parameters, summarized in a table, will be much clearer.

ModelParameter	Galaxy S5	iPhone 5s	Galaxy S6	iPhone 6
Technology	SuperAMOLED	IPS	Super AMOLED	IPS (Retina HD)
Diagonal	5.1 inch	4 inches	5.1 inch	4.7 inches
Permission	1080×1920	1136×640	1440×2560	1334×750
ppi	432	326	577	326
Color rendering	16 million	16 million	16 million	16 million

More detailed characteristics will be useful only to enthusiastic people. In practice, we see fairly clear screens (even at 326 pixels per inch).

Of some of the shortcomings in color reproduction, it can be noted that the spectrum “slides” into blue, and Samsung into red, but this does not interfere with transmitting a juicy picture.

Resolution and diagonal are also a moot point. The sixth generation of both devices received record-breaking large screens.

This is a great solution for working with multimedia, but at the same time it mercilessly eats battery charge .

Smartphone stuffing

It makes no sense to compare the fifth and sixth models with each other, because the continuous development of technologies does not give everyone the opportunity to keep up with them, and what was a breakthrough a year and a half ago is now irrelevant.

Processors and performance

The fifth models are equipped with A7 processors (iPhone) and Snapdragon 801 (Galaxy S5), respectively. The first dual-core at 1.35 GHz, the second - four cores with a clock frequency of 2.5 GHz.

Note! With such a clock spread, the performance is more affected by the OS. So, iPhone is faster a competitor opens native applications, and Samsung opens third-party ones.

In the sixth models, Apple invariably follows the tradition and uses its own dual-core A8 processor at 1.4 GHz.

The Korean company also decided to use its own processor and installed the Samsung Exynos 7420, an eight-core CPU, in the S6.

The eight cores are actually split into two quad-core processors at 1.5 and 2.1 GHz.

A less powerful chip acts as an auxiliary and turns on only at high loads.

Memory: operational and stationary

Which smartphone can store more information? Things with RAM are better with Samsung: S5 - 2 GB, S6 - 3 GB. Both "apples" are supplied with 1 GB.

Moreover, their performance does not suffer, due to excellent optimization. Only the S5 has an SD card slot (up to 128 GB).

The remaining models are offered with built-in storage (S6 - 32/64/128 GB, 5s - 16/32/64, 6 - 16/64/128).

In this case, the actual available space for storing personal data will be somewhat less, since this parameter does not take into account the OS.

Autonomy and battery

The battery capacity of both Galaxy (2550 mAh for the S6 and 2800 mAh for the S5) is almost twice that of the iPhone (1810 mAh for the 6 and 1560 for the 5s). Autonomous work for all devices is approximately the same.

Why is this happening?

Because the "Koreans" use more energy-intensive processors.

Each device is capable of about 260 hours of standby time, 20 hours of talk time and about 50 hours of music playback.

Fingerprints

All of these devices are equipped with a fingerprint sensor.

And if it works fine for the older generation of Samsung and both iPhones, then the S5 is equipped with some kind of frank misunderstanding.

Galaxy S5. For the first month, Samsung data, 11 million devices were sold. Video bloggers from PhoneBuff, who have been actively using the gadget all this time, named 25 reasons why the iPhone 5s is better flagship smartphone Samsung.

PhoneBuff called the premium design and form factor of the device the first advantage of the iPhone 5s over the Korean competitor. A smartphone, dressed in a stylish aluminum case, is considered by many as a standard of quality. The compact luxury device from Apple proves that not everything is decided by dimensions. The 4-inch iPhone is much more comfortable to use than the 5.1-inch Galaxy S5.

An important advantage of the iPhone 5s is the presence of a physical Mute button, which makes it easy to turn off the sound when a person is at an important meeting or at the cinema. Another bonus is the dual LED flash, Apple calls it "True Tone" - two LEDs with different colors. They operate at different intensities in order to adapt to the room lighting and provide better lighting at night. Also, the iPhone 5s has a better speaker placement - it sounds louder and clearer when the device is on a flat surface.

Another unique feature of the iPhone 5s is the M7 motion co-processor. It continuously monitors the movement activity of the smartphone owner and transmits the data to mobile applications. Thus, fitness programs running in the background have practically no effect on the time. battery life devices.

Other advantages of the iPhone 5s over the Galaxy S5, according to reviewers, lie in the plane software. iOS is a more secure and easier to use mobile platform. In Android, on the basis of which the Korean device works, there are no many proprietary applications and Apple services, including Siri, iTunes, AirDrop, AirPlay, Find My iPhone and more.

Applications in App Store better and more reliable, PhoneBuff states. At the same time, iOS does not have pre-installed operator programs that the Galaxy S5 has and which cannot be removed from the device without obtaining root access.

Earlier, the authoritative newspaper The New York Times, after comparing the iPhone 5s and Galaxy S5, that the product of the Korean company Samsung loses to the Apple smartphone "in almost all parameters important to the user."

Experts note that the operating system is decisive when choosing a smartphone. The main advantage of the Korean device over the iPhone 5s, Molly calls a slightly longer battery life, moisture resistance and a larger display. The first two parameters, according to the observer, are quite insignificant. And the situation with latest Apple will fix this fall when it releases the 4.7-inch and 5.5-inch iPhone 6 models.

Test duel Samsung GALAXY S5 vs. Apple iPhone 5s: Battle of the Flagships

Not always the one who came up with something becomes the one who brought it to mind. Oh, not always.

Device Comparison

Parameter
Operating system	iOS 7	Android 4.4
Screen	TFT IPS, 4'', 640x1136 pix.	AMOLED, 5.1'', 1080x1920 pix.
Pixel density per inch (PPI)	326	432
CPU	2x1300 MHz, ARMv8 64-bit	Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC 4x2457 MHz, ARMv7 32-bit
GPU	PowerVR G6430	Adreno 330
SIM card type	nano SIM	micro SIM
RAM	1 GB	2 GB
Built-in memory	16/32/64 GB	16/32 GB (about 5 GB used by the system)
Memory cards	No	micro SD (up to 128 GB)
WiFi	802.11a/b/g/n	802.11a/b/g/n/ac
Bluetooth	4.0	4.0
rear camera	8 MP, flash, autofocus	16 MP, flash, autofocus
Front-camera	1.2 MP	2 MP
Additionally	GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, LTE	GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, LTE (not available on all models), NFC, IrDA, IP67 waterproof, FM
Dimensions	58.6x123.8x7.6 mm	72.5x142x8.1 mm
Weight	112 g	145 g
Battery	non-removable, 1560 mAh	removable, 2800 mAh
Price at the time of publication	28500–38000 rubles	30000 rubles

Source: ZOOM.CNews

In general, there are many different variations of the Samsung GALAXY S5. We took the G900F model, which is equipped with LTE, a Qualcomm processor and 16 GB of memory - this is exactly what we had on the test and it will most likely become the most popular in Russia.

By the way, about LTE. We had an idea to compare the average data transfer rate by cellular network under the same conditions, but no matter how many tests we ran, in general, the iPhone 5s and GALAXY S5 showed similar results. Unless, according to the indication of the smartphones themselves, the GALAXY S5 had worse reception quality.

Appearance, design

Samsung implements many "chips" only because Apple has it. For example, a fingerprint scanner, which we will talk about below. But sometimes one gets the feeling that they put a high price on their products because Apple does it.

But Apple has quality materials (metal, strained glass), and replacing the smartphone with a new one under warranty, while Samsung has plastic, which they disguise as metal or leather. The question is - so why should the new GALAXY S5 cost like an iPhone? However, only the most impatient give 30 thousand for a new product from Samsung. It is worth waiting a couple of months, or even a couple of weeks, and the price for it will traditionally fall by 30%.

But the imitation of materials is, in our opinion, somehow not serious. A low-slung, tinted nine with a spoiler and vinyl decals is what Samsung's design is all about. Note that this is generally a problem of Korean design - to fake materials and finishing elements. For example, Korean guitar manufacturers like to “draw” fake screws on the body of the instrument (the author judges from personal experience, because it is related to musical creativity). Imagine: a volumetric bulge that repeats the shape of the screw head, even the correct slot is available, but in fact it is part of the body and it is impossible to unscrew such a “screw”.

In general, the iPhone looks not only better (although this is more of a subjective parameter), but also “more honest”. Its body is made of better and more expensive materials, which is already quite an objective fact.

On the other hand, the GALAXY S5 has IP67 dust and moisture protection. What does this mean? In theory - full protection against dust penetration and protection against short-term immersion in water to a depth of not more than 1 m (at the same time, continuous operation under water, as in Sony flagships, not guaranteed). However, the design of the smartphone case does not look very secure. Two things are confusing: an easy-to-open micro-USB 3.0 slot cover and a “removable” cover.

Even with the brand new GALAXY S5, the cover is easy to open. Too easy.

Do not close the lid tightly - the phone will sink. Each time you change the SIM card or SD card, you will have to carefully check several times whether all the latches are fixed. In practice, users often do not notice that one of the latches is not fixed (not specifically for this smartphone, but in general for all smartphones with a similar fastening of the cover). Well, there is a possibility that sooner or later the latches will no longer securely hold the lid.

The lid is rubberized, but the “reciprocal” part on the body is somehow not worked out.

In general, washing a smartphone under running water is still not recommended, swimming with it (even in fresh water) is even more so. As for using the smartphone in the rain, the author of this text fell into the rain several times with the iPhone 5s, and even talked on it, and the smartphone is alive and well.

So, given the higher quality of the materials, the iPhone 5s wins in design.

Ergonomics

Ergonomics, in this case, is how comfortable it is in the hand when using (the last clarification is important - we need to not only hold the smartphone, but also press buttons, swipe the screen, etc.). In principle, here both the iPhone and Samsung GALAXY S5 are almost the same, except that, due to the large screen, it is problematic for a Korean to reach the opposite corner of the screen with his thumb.

Yes, we know that some people love it, but the fact is that using the iPhone with one hand is more convenient.

True, it's already easier to press the lock / power button on the GALAXY S5 - it's on the side.

But speaking of buttons, the iPhone has a mute switch. It is strange that manufacturers did not make it a rule to copy this detail either: it is really convenient.

Outcome? Draw - both smartphones have ergonomic advantages and disadvantages in about equal amounts.

Screen

It is difficult to objectively compare the screens of different devices. In fact, the only objective parameter for evaluating the screen is the margin of brightness in the sun. Or, more precisely, the readability of the screen in direct sunlight. Everything else: size, resolution, sub-pixel grid, and even color reproduction - are perceived subjectively. For example, the author of this text immediately noticed PenTile on the screen of the Samsung GALAXY S5, but there is a Full-HD resolution and a very high pixel density. But there are people who are not bothered by PenTile even on low-resolution screens (and someone even now thought: “What is PenTile?”).

Or take the screen size: for those who have a tablet, it is not so important to have a large screen. Everything depends on the scenario of using the phone: if you read a lot on it, watch movies and play games, then yes, you need a big screen. If you communicate in social networks, listen to music, wear your phone in jeans (of course, "shovels" like GALAXY Note also fit in a jeans pocket, but this pocket is quickly wiped, unless it’s some kind of “levis”), you shoot on the camera - then the screen size does not matter, and sometimes even on the contrary, you want a more compact device. That is, with regards to screen size, we cannot objectively conclude - more means better or worse.

Resolution: The larger the screen size, the higher the resolution should be. Ultimately, the determining factor is not the resolution itself, but the pixel density. While most manufacturers are competing in the megapixel race (screens with 2K resolution have already been announced), Apple continues to use a resolution of 1136x640, which is even lower than HD (1280x720) and, moreover, Full-HD (1920x1080). However, what will the user get from a larger screen? In theory - a clearer picture, but in practice - iPhone screen 5s is already quite clear, at a distance of 20 cm from the eyes it is almost impossible to see individual pixels. If you look closely, then here and GALAXY screen S5 won't look sharp enough due to PenTile ( TFT screens with RGB subpixel placement are sharper at the same pixel density). Can we say that the GALAXY S5 screen is better because it has a higher resolution? It is unlikely - we are not worried about the bare numbers, but the result. Of course, if Apple decides to increase the diagonal of the iPhone, it will have to take care of a higher resolution. But for now, 1136x640 pixels is enough.

Color reproduction is an objective parameter in itself, but practice shows that ordinary people prefer bright, acid colors rather than natural shades. This applies not only to smartphones, but also to TVs, photos, videos. Notice how much brighter and more contrast modern films have become compared to the hits of the 80s and 90s.

However, neither the iPhone 5s nor the GALAXY S5 can boast of perfect color reproduction. The iPhone is slightly “red”, and the Samsung GALAXY S5 is noticeably “blue”. Due to the temporary absence of spectrophotometer data, this parameter will also have to be rejected as decisive - someone will probably like the color reproduction of the GALAXY S5 more, someone - the iPhone 5s.

In general, instead of "acid" colors in the GALAXY S5 (as in many other GALAXY smartphones) you can choose more natural colors in setting up screen profiles, but few people bother with this. "Blue" screen, however, this will not stop.

The most natural color reproduction - in the "Standard" mode

As for the readability of the screen in the sun, here Samsung is perhaps a little brighter than the iPhone. Not that it was impossible to read or watch pictures on an iPhone in direct sunlight, there is enough brightness there, but the Samsung is still brighter. Conditionally, you can give victory in terms of screen quality to the GALAXY S5.

Functionality

There are no questions here - the smartphone on Android wins in absentia. If we compare the set of functions in isolation from the implementation of these functions, the smartphone from Samsung wins. Of course, the iPhone has a few features in store that the competitor does not have (as one example, using third party applications it can be used as a guitar processor, there are no such applications on Android, and it is far from the fact that they can be made), but in any case, the victory in functionality is for Android. There is nothing even to discuss. Swype, NFC, free file transfer via Bluetooth, the ability to send any files, both by mail and in messengers, and not just photos, support for SD cards, connecting external storage devices via USB, and so on - all this is an iPhone and never dreamed of and is unlikely to even be dreamed of in the near future.

One of the software guitar processors on the iPhone. Guitarists will appreciate it, the rest will not care.

Ease of use

It can be said that "usability" (usability, tracing paper with usability) is the reverse side of functionality. Do you know the difference between a geek and a simple user? The geek is interested in the very set of functions and equipment into “good” and “bad” (or into “buy!” And “for nothing in life”), he divides exclusively by the set of functions.

For a simple user, how the functions are implemented is more important. And since the market is focused on users, not on geeks (there are more users and their solvency, oddly enough, is higher), it was the insufficiently convenient implementation that actually “killed” some functions, and even entire groups of devices.

For example, tablets on "desktop" operating systems existed before, but ceased to be produced and sold a dozen years ago due to the fact that they were too inconvenient: with a very inaccurate stylus (it was impossible to work with the screen with fingers), a weak battery (3-5 hours of operation maximum), heavy, bulky . When the iPad appeared, it was (and remains) much less functional, but it is due to its high usability that it not only became very popular, but also gave rise to whole class devices - tablets on mobile OS.

Another less obvious example: helmets virtual reality. They were invented back in the 90s and they had similar problems - large weight and dimensions, low resolution, high price. Today, helmets are slowly making a comeback, but only because they are lighter, cheaper, and approved. modern TVs(Almost). And even then, mass demand has not yet been observed, although the geeks are delighted. But in any case, the implementation of functionality has improved significantly.

In short, the average user doesn't need a poorly implemented feature. He needs a ready-made device that “out of the box” does well and without much persuasion what it can do. In this sense, Apple's devices win - with enough functionality, they can be quickly learned and easy to use. Perhaps if we compared the iPhone 5s with some top-end smartphones on Windows phone, here it would be either equality or even victory for Windows Phone (smartphones on this OS are even less functional, but, at the same time, more simple).

However, on the Android OS, they could well have made a convenient and simple smartphone. There are even some, although they are very few. Manufacturers themselves overload the interface in pursuit of large quantity functions that are then used by a negligible percentage of users. GALAXY S5 is a great example of this: overloaded menus that make it difficult to find what you need, a bunch of incomprehensible settings, sometimes exotic, which are mixed with really useful ones on an equal footing.

After spending an hour or two on the phone, you can select the ones you need from these shortcuts.

A simple example - we needed to find the LTE switch setting. Which of the group's labels do you think " Network connections» contains this setting?

Some menu items are present in several groups at once, which greatly increases their already rather large list.

The correct answer is "Other networks".

Or take applications. When the GALAXY S5 is launched for the first time, the user finds 47 application shortcuts of various applications in the menu. However, none of them office suite, customers social networks and games. What are the 47 labels for? Obviously, this number is excessive. See for yourself: two browsers (standard and Chrome), two applications for Email(Gmail and universal), two Music apps and another Play Music, Books and Play Books, two Play Movies apps (one of them has a colon between the words) and one more " Video”, two photo galleries: “Gallery” and “Photo”, shortcuts “Settings” and “ Google Settings"(and also separately - just Google). Why is this for the user? And most importantly - why do we need two or three applications that perform the same function?

This is all installed in the Samsung GALAXY S5 by default. What for?

If you are an Android expert and do not understand the essence of the problem, put yourself in the place of a person who does not know how the standard Android browser differs from Google Chrome (given that the former can synchronize with Chrome data) - how he should feel after seeing all this on your smartphone?

Of course, Android fans will say that everything can be customized. But think about how logical it sounds: a person who prefers brevity and simplicity will sit and set up a smartphone for himself for several hours? Is it conciseness and simplicity? Of course no. This person will simply buy another smartphone. For example, iPhone 5s.

Performance

We added the "performance" paragraph only because many readers would probably look for it with their eyes, and if they did not find it, they would write us an angry comment. But, in fact, comparing the performance of the iPhone 5s and GALAXY S5 is pointless. Or, more accurately, aimlessly. Both smartphones do an excellent job with all the most sophisticated games, play Full-HD videos (including from YouTube) and smoothly render interface animations.

In general, even if we found some adequate benchmark (except for the Futuremark graphics test for mobile devices), which allows us to objectively compare different hardware on different operating systems and bring the results to a common denominator, there would be no sense from this study. . This is not a PC for you, where you can read a review of a new video card (or gaming laptop) and conclude whether this piece of hardware is enough for you to run the next Crysis or not.

As for the difference in the "digit capacity" of the processors (64-bit for the iPhone 5s and 32-bit for the GALAXY S5), here the comparison is meaningless. For iOS there is a music GALAXY app Band, which allows you to create 32 music tracks on smartphones / tablets with a 64-bit processor, while on devices with a 32-bit one - only 16 more expensive. But there is no such application for Android, and therefore the GALAXY S5 does not lose anything by the fact that it has “only” a 32-bit processor.

Fingerprint sensor

The fingerprint scanner was installed in smartphones even before the iPhone - a well-known fact. For example, in Toshiba Portege G900. However, the idea did not take root - it was inconvenient to use it (remember the discussion above about usability?). Apple decided to rework the idea and came up with an optical sensor that works quickly and to which it is enough to put a finger on it, and not drive along the sensor in a certain direction and at a certain speed.

As a rule, what appears in the iPhone, then, soon, appears in other manufacturers. True, HTC was ahead of Samsung by embedding a fingerprint sensor in the HTC One Max. The sensor, however, was of an old type, not at all like that of Apple, and was located on the back of the smartphone.

Setting up fingerprints on iPhone 5s

In the GALAXY S5, Samsung placed the sensor in the home button - like the iPhone 5s. True, here the sensor is not optical, and therefore loses to the sensor in the iPhone 5s in all respects:

- in GALAXY S5, you need to swipe your finger along the sensor (and not very quickly, otherwise it won’t work), but in iPhone 5s it’s enough to attach it;

- if in the iPhone 5s the finger can be applied in any position, then on the Galaxy S5 - only strictly perpendicular to the bottom edge of the phone;

- in the GALAXY S5, you must definitely run the entire fingertip over the sensor, if you don’t get it a little, it won’t work;

When you need to quickly unlock your smartphone, it rarely works the first time

- in iPhone 5s, you can remember up to five fingers, and in GALAXY S5 - only three (4 fingers would be enough for the author of this article: two thumbs and two index fingers).

Setting up fingerprints in GALAXY S5

In general, Samsung could, for example, add the ability to set the launch of certain applications on fingerprints, as HTC did, but, alas, Koreans only spy on Americans. But in vain. It turns out that the fingerprint sensor in the GALAXY S5 loses even to that in the HTC One Max, not to mention the iPhone 5s.

Camera

We have already written (and clearly demonstrated) more than once that the quality of a camera is not measured by megapixels. Actually, Apple does not increase the number of megapixels in iPhones right from the iPhone 4S, and the quality of shooting, at the same time, is growing. For example, iPhone 5s shots are sharper than iPhone 5 shots with greater dynamic range.

As for the comparison with the Samsung GALAXY S5, the situation is similar - the pictures from the iPhone 5s are sharper, you can see this below (left - iPhone 5s, right - Samsung). We reduced the size of the 16-megapixel image from the Samsung GALAXY S5 (which should have sharpened the image compared to the 100% crop) so that the sizes of objects from the cameras of both smartphones were approximately the same. It is worth noting here that the viewing angle of the Samsung GALAXY S5 camera is narrower (again, this should in theory lead to higher sharpness of distant objects) than that of the iPhone 5s. We have highlighted in red those areas that are worth paying attention to.

Left - iPhone 5s, right - GALAXY S5.

As you can see, even with the lower resolution and wider field of view, the 100% crop from the iPhone 5s boasts better sharpness. In the pictures from the iPhone, you can see the branches of trees even where the Samsung has solid soap.

However, the GALAXY S5 has a wider dynamic range. This can be clearly seen in the following photos taken in HDR mode (the first photo is from the iPhone, the second is from the Samsung GALAXY S5).

Clicking on a thumbnail will open the full size image

However, the bad thing is that the HDR mode of the GALAXY S5 must be turned on forcibly, while on the iPhone 5s it works automatically.

The wide dynamic range of the Korean is clearly visible when shooting in the dark:

Clicking on a thumbnail will open the full size image

On the other hand, the iPhone 5s showed exactly the picture that the user is likely to want to see. It is unlikely that anyone will be interested in color noise in the dark.

A few more pictures:

Clicking on a thumbnail will open the full size image

Clicking on a thumbnail will open the full size image

Clicking on a thumbnail will open the full size image

The color rendition of both cameras is a moot point. On the one hand, the GALAXY S5 shows a picture closer to reality (although I want to remove the green tint from the sky blue, there is too much of it), on the other hand, have you seen realistic photos in photo albums for a long time? Colors are now "twisting" everything, even professional photographers. Some of them prefer bright saturated colors, others - muted, like in old films on films. But this and that - does not correspond to what the eye sees.

In general, there are a lot of settings in the GALAXY S5 camera. And this is rather bad (see the section on "usability"). The phone is not a professional camera, here it is necessary like this: point the lens, press the button, get an excellent (at the maximum capabilities of the smartphone camera) picture.

In our opinion, even the iPhone camera interface is slightly overloaded, it could have been made simpler.

But the GALAXY S5 is much more complicated. Try to guess from the first time where to switch the video recording speed, for example?

Well, below you can see the result of that very slow motion video. Top video is from iPhone, bottom video is from Samsung GALAXY S5.

Video from iPhone 5s

Video from GALAXY S5

Here you can see a few more interesting points. First, both smartphones downgraded the video resolution from Full-HD to HD without warning. At the same time, the video from the Galaxy S5 shows that in reality the resolution is even lower (most likely it is 720i instead of 720p).

Secondly, the GALAXY S5 recorded the video without sound, while the iPhone has the sound in place.

At the same time, in normal mode, the GALAXY S5 can record videos in Ultra HD quality, which the iPhone is not yet available.

Verdict? The iPhone is sharper, the GALAXY S5 has more features, and overall the quality is comparable. But since we are talking about the phone's camera, where a large number of functions only get in the way, the victory is for the iPhone 5s.

autonomy

There is no direct relationship between the frequency of the processor and the performance of the device built on it (once again we will give an example about the PlayStation 4 with a 1.6 GHz processor and the PlayStation 3 with a 3.2 GHz processor). That is, if you take a specific processor and overclock it to specific device, then yes, performance will certainly increase, although not linearly. But if we are talking about different processors and different devices running on different operating systems, then you can forget about the clock frequency altogether.

Why are we talking about processors in the “autonomy” paragraph? But because, unlike performance, there is a direct relationship between the processor frequency and power consumption. Of course, technology, instruction set, number of cores - all this also affects, but, as a rule, the higher clock frequency processor, the more electricity it "eats". We specifically emphasize this point to explain why an iPhone with a 1560 mAh battery lasts as long as a Galaxy with 2800 mAh. Of course, under a similar use case.

In terms of autonomy - a draw.

Comparison results