Does kaspersky protect against a new virus. Kaspersky Anti-Virus for Mac: is it needed? "Your connection is not secure"
What is the difference between paid and free versions of Kaspersky Internet Security for Android.
Many people think that antivirus on Android is not needed at all, but we have already considered this issue earlier: there are a lot of different malware for this OS, including those in official stores like Google Play. That is, an antivirus would not even interfere. Then the second question arises: which one to choose?
Which mobile antivirus to choose?
We, of course, will advise ours - Kaspersky Internet Security for Android. This, in fact, is not just an antivirus - it is a whole mobile security complex, which also includes the Anti-theft module, the ability to create a blacklist of numbers and much more. Kaspersky Internet Security for Android can be paid or free - how do they differ and which version do you need?
What's in the free version of Kaspersky Internet Security for Android
In essence, the demon paid version Kaspersky Internet Security consists of just the three parts listed above. First, it's an anti-virus engine - exactly the same as in the paid version.
Secondly, this is the Anti-theft module, which allows you to send commands to your phone in case of loss - block the device and find its coordinates, turn on the siren (suddenly the device just fell behind the sofa?) Or take a secret picture with front camera. Also, Kaspersky Internet Security for Android can keep track of whether the SIM card has been changed in the phone, and if so, send you the data of the new SIM card.
Thirdly, it is the ability to create a black list of numbers from which you do not want to receive calls or SMS. There is no built-in database, as in our Who Calls application: you just manually enter the numbers - and the program remembers them. Further, she will block calls from these numbers and delete SMS messages received from them.
What's added in the paid version of Kaspersky Internet Security for Android
The most basic difference between the free and paid versions is the automatic real-time scanning. AT free version scanning the device for malware must be run manually - the application periodically reminds you of this. The paid version scans automatically. We downloaded a new file - it will definitely be scanned, and there is no need to worry every time.
The paid version of Kaspersky Internet Security scans your device in real time
In paid versions of Kaspersky Internet Security for Android has other useful options. For example, there is an App Lock feature that allows you to protect access to certain applications with a pin code. This is true, for example, in cases where you give your tablet to children and do not want them to accidentally delete all your contacts or write something awkward to your boss.
The paid version also protects against phishing messages by checking whether it is a real SMS from your bank or a fake one. Fraudsters love strangers bank accounts, so the importance of this feature should not be underestimated.
Plus, there is a module that protects against dangerous websites - it analyzes all the pages you try to access, and if it is a malicious site, the module does not allow you to load it.
Finally, the paid version allows you to hide some of your contacts - if someone gains access to your phone, they will not see them in the contacts and calls list.
In general, the paid version of Kaspersky Internet Security for Android has many additional features compared to the free version.
Switching from a free version to a paid version is easy - it's done right in the app. You can choose a subscription for a year or a month. If you do not renew your subscription, the antivirus will continue to work, but in the free version.
So which version should you choose?
If you are ready to manually run a scan after downloading each new file, then you can save money and use the free version of the antivirus - it catches malware just as well, you just have to think that you need to scan everything again.
If you just want to use your Android device in peace, once again without thinking about potential threats, then the paid version is more suitable for you - it automatically checks the device for malware and is able to protect against phishing sites and messages.
tweet
Kaspersky Anti-Virus for a long time stirred the hearts of users. The horror and gray hair from the squeal of a pig when a virus is detected is an unforgettable experience, comparable only to the languid voice of the Avast antivirus, saying “Virus database has been updated” at one in the morning. But the pig was removed, the charm was gone, the software became faceless. Following the trend of releasing free versions, Kaspersky Free was born. Does it have a highlight? I watched and share my impressions with you.
You can download Kaspersky Free on the official website: www.kaspersky.ru/free-antivirus
What for?
This question was in my head for several days, while I went to the most remote corners of the Internet in the hope that some of the downloaded files would be missed by the antivirus. No, Kaspersky did not fail at the stage of downloading viruses from sites where you can supposedly find everything. After all, the anti-virus database is large. If you download infected files via torrents, most often the detection occurs after the download is complete, but this is completely normal. With flash drives, things are worse, self-written scripts that replace folders will not be detected by Kaspersky Free, this is a common misfortune of all antiviruses, and it is unfair to write down a disadvantage specifically for this software.
The problem is that Kaspersky Free is toothless. There is nothing remarkable in it, as if it was made according to the antivirus samples of the early 2000s. He knows how to detect viruses entered in the database, this is where his powers end, there are no "chips".
The saddest thing is that the "Application Control" module, which is present in paid versions, is not in Free. This narrows the range of protection because, as the virus and Petya attacks have shown, classic antiviruses are useless when malware infiltrates through operating system vulnerabilities. The only more or less effective method to block such an attack - monitor the actions of all running programs and sound an alarm if any one tries to encrypt or delete files.
It somehow differs from what I see. Taking into account modern threats the antivirus does not seem to provide adequate protection at the level of paid counterparts:
In my opinion, the inclusion of a module for analyzing the actions of programs would make KFree an interesting solution against the background of analogues. Perhaps some semblance of this type of protection was nevertheless integrated into the heuristic analyzer of the file antivirus, so that at a critical moment, when some other Vasya or Oleg appears, to resist malicious actions ... But I doubt it.
By the way, the Defender antivirus built into Windows 10 also has no control over program actions. That's just him already installed with the operating system. Why change it to another product with no competitive advantage? Will the user want to bother with the installation?
free cheese
Why was Kaspersky Free released? I have a theory about this.
The reason is the struggle for users' computers. With the inclusion of its own antivirus software in Windows 8 and later 10, Microsoft entered a race that involved all antivirus software developers. " Windows Defender"not only tries to protect users from viruses, but also enables the company's virus analysts to quickly respond to virus outbreaks by tracking attempts to infect a PC.
Other developers of security software "cut the chip" before MS. Free Avast, Avira and others have long settled on the computers of users from different countries. Kaspersky joined this race a bit late, but better late than never.
Like a panic button, antiviruses are not always able to instantly protect the user, but they allow experts to study suspicious files and clarify infection statistics in order to later, for example, block command centers botnet from infected computers.
The same notorious epidemic Wanna Cry, encrypting user files dear to the heart, was suspended by virus analyst Markus Hutchins, who works for the British cybersecurity company Kryptos Logic. It is unlikely that he would have learned about the virus so quickly if there were no statistics and examples of infection at hand.
So, I believe that the main reason for the existence of a free antivirus from a domestic laboratory is an attempt to expand the ability to search and analyze threats. This is evidenced by a couple of points from the license agreement during the installation of Kaspersky Free:
Clauses 6.1. and 6.2. copy each other. As I understand it, if you refuse to participate in the Kaspersky Security Network “in order to increase the level of information protection”, something is still maybe go to the developers' servers.
And here is a quote from the description of the Kaspersky Security Network function in the official help:
To improve the protection of your computer, Kaspersky Free uses cloud-based protection. Cloud protection is implemented using the infrastructure of the Kaspersky Security Network, which uses data received from users around the world.
User participation in the Kaspersky Security Network allows Kaspersky Lab to quickly receive information about new threats and their sources, develop ways to neutralize them, and reduce the number of false positives. Participation in Kaspersky Security Network provides you with access to information about the reputation of applications and websites.
Cloud protection is used in many antiviruses, including paid ones. Is it bad that antiviruses collect information? I think it's more likely good than evil if this function can be customized. I myself sent the found malware more than once so that they would be detected as soon as possible. The trouble is that all developers pull the blanket over themselves. Antiviruses have different levels of protection, which is quite difficult to measure, users do not always win. Now, if there was a truly common database of signatures and attack methods ...
Disadvantages of Kaspersky Free
When instead of one software a whole bunch of any interfering software is put, the desire to use such product. There is only one program here - Kaspersky Secure Connection - but why does it run without my permission? After installation, there is a checkbox to launch only the antivirus:
Moreover, it registers in autoload!
I don’t know how the paid Kaspersky Internet Security behaves, but if the situation is the same there, it’s sad. Dark UX patterns will not attract happy users. Fortunately, through "Applications and features" the program can be removed:
"Your connection is not secure"
After installing Kaspersky Free, you may encounter a problem opening protected sites in Mozilla Firefox. I had this problem on a Windows 7 computer. Sites using the protocol https, instead of opening will report an error "Your connection is not secure." Text details:
*website address* is using an invalid security certificate.
Error Code: SEC_ERROR_UNKNOWN_ISSUER
The thing is that any version of Kaspersky Anti-Virus intercepts secure traffic going from the site to you and back. This is done by replacing the site's digital certificate with your own. AT Firefox browser a separate certificate store is used, it is not always possible to infiltrate there, hence the error.
Therefore, we simply disable interference with the contents of visited sites: right-click on the antivirus icon in the tray - Setup - Advanced - Network and put a dot on Don't scan secure connections«.
I also turned off the option " Embed a script for interacting with web pages in traffic“because extraneous scripts interfere with the development of sites.
importunity
Another unpleasant moment is the requirement to register on the site. Well, I do not want to register, what now? This window does not turn off in any way, there is no necessary option in the settings.
The window will appear daily, and, as usual, at the most inopportune moment.
What remains
There is nothing outstanding in Kaspersky Free. He does his job, but there is nothing to praise for.
- Checking the disk for viruses (file antivirus) - everyone has it.
- Checking downloaded files (web anti-virus) is also a standard feature.
- Checking mail and traffic in messaging programs - completely normal components, there are everywhere.
- Protected screen keyboard- Yes, more or less interesting thing, but little known.
Perhaps it makes sense to install it on computers with outdated Windows 7. The share of such PCs is still high (about 30%). But these are old computers with a well-established set of software, users could opt for another product.
On modern desktop computers and there is no place for laptops either. They come with Windows 10, where Defender is preinstalled. Sometimes it gets to the point of absurdity Lenovo laptops when put in addition trial version some another antivirus. With such a zoo, it makes no sense to put a beginner.
Therefore, perhaps, I will finish with a brief summary: Kaspersky Free is an antivirus that simply exists.
At the end of last week, the US news agency Bloomberg published under the title "The company that protects you online has close ties to Russian spies". The article is dedicated, of course, to Kaspersky Lab.
According to the article, since 2012 a number of top managers have either left or been fired from Kaspersky Lab, “who were replaced in many cases by people with closer ties to the Russian military and intelligence agencies.”
“Some of these people are actively assisting in the criminal investigations of the FSB, the successor to the KGB, using data from approximately 400 million users who rely on Kaspersky Lab software,” according to Bloomberg, “six current and former employees of the company who refused to talk about it publicly because they fear reprisals.” Insiders fearful of reprisals also said that "when Evgeny Kaspersky is not traveling, he rarely misses a weekly bath with a group of about 5 to 10 people, which usually includes representatives of the Russian special services." (Those who have already imagined creepy group scenes involving Evgeny Kaspersky and a dozen other men in the best traditions of the Big Guns movie may be disappointed, because the Bloomberg text is talking about something completely different.)
Evgeny Kaspersky denied allegations of links with the Russian special services in his blog.
“The good news is that Bloomberg dug us very hard. And with insight. (we should also find out the names of the scoundrels who gave such an insider),” Evgeny Kaspersky reports the good news.
“And what did they dig up? Never mind!! Firstly, a third of the article is purely reliable, public facts, which can be verified on our website, in our public reports and other public documents. Secondly, which was very strange (it's Bloomberg!). Much of the material is false. An outright lie. Speculation, assumptions, conclusions based on incorrect information and misinterpreted. Sue them, or what?” Evgeny Kaspersky asks.
“The serious news agency Bloomberg was looking for a connection with “Russian spies” - and found only ... a bathhouse. Hooray! And they could not find anything, because there is none. It is very difficult to look for something that is not there,” writes Evgeny Kaspersky.
Evgeny Kaspersky, for obvious reasons, does not develop the topic of the bathhouse, however, if we develop it and draw an analogy, it will become quite obvious that if, for example, a person regularly goes to the bathhouse with thieves in law, then most likely he is related to crime, if he goes to the bathhouse with someone else, then he is most likely related to something else, and if he goes to the bathhouse with FSB officers, then they need him for some reason. This is as obvious as the fact that if, for example, it turned out that the former head of Microsoft, Steve Ballmer, regularly attended the synagogue along with a group of a dozen employees of the US National Security Agency, then many people would have questions (by the way, the fact that the NSA was involved in the development of operational Windows systems XP and Windows Vista, "protecting these operating systems from worms and trojans", Microsoft officially back in 2007, i.e. 6 years before the revelations of Edward Snowden, so then information about such cooperation was perceived completely differently than now, when it is obvious that the NSA specialists were engaged in the search for vulnerabilities mainly not for the purpose of protection, but for the purpose of exploiting them, and at the same time inserted their own spy bookmarks and backdoors).
Installing antivirus program or a program of the Internet Security class, which is designed to protect not only from viruses, but also from any other malicious actions, you actually let a Trojan horse into your computer, giving it full control over your entire system, all other applications and all your activities. Antivirus can scan any files and collect any information from the computer, transferring it to remote server your developer in such a way that you won't notice it, since it can be done in the background, for example, during automatic update virus databases or any other legitimate actions that you yourself approve.
At the same time, you will not be able to control the actions of one antivirus using another antivirus from another developer, given that Kaspersky Lab itself is the fact that it is pointless to try to install several antiviruses on the system, since they will conflict, interfering with each other, and as a result, neither one of them won't work properly. Therefore, there should be only one antivirus in the system, which will have full control over the entire system. For example, if you have installed Kaspersky Anti-Virus or, worse, Kaspersky Internet Security, then for your money, Kaspersky Lab and people who go to the bath weekly will have full control over your system and all your actions on the computer. But if you want to save money, then you can easily install for yourself, for example, free antiviruses Avast or Avira, but in this case who will control all your data and to whom they will be sent is not very clear.
Many experienced PC users are well aware that an antivirus is a program that is mandatory for comfortable work, because it protects against hacking, eliminates dangerous viruses and prevents attackers from gaining access. However, not everyone is of the same opinion mobile devices ah on Android based. It seems that they do not need such protection. And this is a delusion. Your phone may also contain important data and contacts that are threatened by viruses on the Internet.
How to provide reliable protection in this case? You should purchase a key for mobile Kaspersky for Android - modern software that is well known to everyone as powerful antivirus for computer. The company also has software products and for portable equipment.
Why do you need Kaspersky on a mobile phone?
We must not forget that a modern smartphone is in no way inferior to a personal computer in terms of importance and functionality. With it, you can also search for information on the Internet, visit thematic sites, download files and programs. And this is where the main threat lies. Viruses and spyware can:
- steal your personal data (passwords, contacts, access to bank accounts);
- delete any files;
- arrange for you to be tracked;
- cause breakage.
Using a mobile antivirus, all this can be avoided. You will need to install the application and then activate using the keys for Kaspersky on your Android phone. The program will provide you with full functionality:
- blocking suspicious sites, links and software;
- scanning files in the vault for viruses and spyware;
- blocking access to the camera, memory and other smartphone modules;
- protection of SMS, calls and contacts from surveillance.
The paid version offers advanced functionality, so if you often use your phone for work and store important data on it, then it will not be superfluous to buy.
Where can I buy licensed Kaspersky for Mobile software?
Purchase question software for many it is quite sharp. Many people want to get such a product for free. This is possible, for example, you can use journal keys that are published in various print or digital publications. But their validity is very limited: 30-45 days. If you need long-term protection, then it is more profitable to buy a full-fledged key that is valid for a year.
Surely every user of a smartphone or tablet running on operating system from Google, I wondered: do you need an antivirus for Android? Is the system vulnerable to such attacks in the same way as Windows? If there is a threat, what steps should you take to secure your personal data and finances? Which antivirus is the best?
Do you need antiviruses for Android?
In fact, there are two completely opposite opinions about whether you need to install an antivirus on Android. Supporters of the first, which most often include the developers of such programs themselves, believe that they cannot be dispensed with. Others, on the contrary, tend to think that antiviruses are of no use, and only enough from dubious sources. However, part of the truth is present in both opinions, and she herself, as always, is in the middle. Separately, one may wonder if an antivirus is needed on an Android tablet. After all, most of them do not have the ability to connect a SIM card, respectively, money from the account and contact information cannot be stolen. But do not forget about the possible harm by stealing account passwords or banking data.
Reasons to Install Antivirus Programs
Google itself tried to solve the security problem, and it turned out pretty well. Starting with version 4.2, Android has a feature for checking applications during installation, which monitors internal threats well. However, this does not protect against external threats, such as malware from personal computer, from the network or masquerading as an application. As you can see, the question of whether an antivirus is needed for "Android 4.2" and higher, or only for earlier versions, is quite relevant. Note that the need to install the appropriate software exists for everyone who wants to protect their device. There are several good reasons for this:
1. Having a huge amount malware on various sites and even in the "App Store".
2. Reliable data backup and storage.
3. Protection of the gadget in case of loss or theft.
4. Scanning external and internal memory devices for viruses from outside.
5. Many sites that are not safe to visit from mobile devices.
In a word, it is quite appropriate if you want to protect your gadget from threats. So do you need an antivirus on an Android smartphone? Let's take a look at the most popular applications designed to provide protection and figure it out.
Avast Mobile Security & Antivirus
The application has a wide range of security features. Here, in addition to the antivirus itself, the possibilities of remotely blocking the device, searching for it on the map, spying on the thief using the front camera, prohibiting voice calls and text messaging are presented. There is also an application lock with the ability to restrict access to mobile networks and WiFi.
The anti-virus part itself works mediocrely, skipping some infected applications and phishing text messages. However, the application has decent functionality, which can also be expanded for an additional fee.
Kaspersky Internet Security
Do you need an antivirus for Android? Kaspersky Lab answers this question in the affirmative. She released single application for smartphones and tablets based on the Android OS, combining all the main antivirus functions in it. The program vigilantly monitors all attempts of malicious content to break into your device, but to expand the functionality you will have to fork out, because protecting the Internet browser and checking files are not included in the basic functionality.
The application has all the main features: determining the location of the device using connected networks, secretly photographing the thief, the ability to leave instructions on the lock screen for those who want to return the lost gadget. Pin-code protection for certain contacts and blocking of communication functions will also become in demand.
Norton Mobile Security
Norton is known to many users for its security software. Mobile app well monitors the attempts of viruses to break through the browser, offers extensive anti-theft and other functions. A feature is the scanning of content installed from the "App Store".
However, call blocking is not very convenient to use and not effective enough, and the factory reset function only clears some personal files and contacts. The advantage is that all the functionality is available absolutely free.
Dr.Web Security Space
The anti-virus solution from Doctor Web contains all the features that users can expect from a quality application. Firewall, anti-spam, anti-theft, check device for presence malicious code- all this is present in the development of the most famous company and works excellently. The advantages include a constantly updated anti-virus database and a very fast system scan.
The anti-theft function has wide functionality at the application level from Avast. Here you can even set a list of trusted persons to whom messages will be sent if the SIM card is replaced. We can conclude that this antivirus for Android offers good protective capabilities. Do you need a nice bonus - a handy widget on your desktop? If yes, then feel free to install the application.
Avira Antivirus Security
Antivirus "Avira" can be installed on a device running "Android" for a long time. It boasts a wide audience not only on computers, but also on mobile gadgets. The features offered by the application are in no way inferior to those of its main competitors. The antivirus copes well with its main tasks thanks to the constant updating of databases. Scanning is fast, and after it is completed, it is possible to view a detailed report. This will allow you to understand if you need an antivirus on your Android smartphone.
Fans of frequent installation of applications will certainly like the feature of restricting access to personal data without a corresponding request. The disadvantages of "Avira" include the low accuracy of determining the current location of the device, the lack of Russian localization and paid premium features.
AVG Mobile Antivirus
Among the programs for antivirus protection, AVG deservedly occupies a leading position. There is a scan of all files on the device, a firewall, blocking sites containing suspicious and dangerous content, geolocation of a lost gadget and loud sound signal to search for it. For a fee, you can unlock premium features: photographing a thief, blocking when trying to remove a SIM card, complete shutdown installation possibilities third party applications and data backup.
The disadvantages include the presence of useless elements, such as fake optimization of energy saving and performance. As you can see, the features of the free version are meager compared to the offers of competitors, but the application provides a high level of basic protection against viruses.
Other antiviruses
Also noteworthy are antivirus solutions from McAfee, which offer good basic functionality. Trend Micro Mobile Security & Antivirus can please you with the absence of built-in ads and the presence of good security features. ESET Mobile Security & Antivirus boasts a convenient and pleasant interface, but the application does not offer the highest level of virus protection.
Whether it is necessary to install an antivirus on Android, everyone decides for himself. The mobile platform itself, with a billion user audience, is a tasty morsel for hackers and just bullies, and they will always find a way to get into the device. However, the rational use of the gadget can practically nullify all these attempts, even in the absence of a security program. On the other hand, is it worth the risk? Moreover, there are a sufficient number of solutions on the market, from which everyone can choose the right one for themselves. You may want to install free antivirus to Android. Whether you need paid functionality, decide for yourself.
