Two-pane bookmark manager for Firefox on ExtJS.
Greetings cheaters. I'd like to talk about my extension and ask for a little help.
The extension is called Total bookmarks, because. its interface is almost completely borrowed from Total commander.
Why did it need to be done at all?
Indeed, many people put bookmarks in pre-created folders and never run into rubble in which it is difficult to find something. Unfortunately, at one fine moment I realized that I did not belong to them. If I come across an interesting article that I have no time to read now, then I put the bookmark right at the root so as not to forget, and then I forget about the article itself and about the bookmark. And one day, scrolling through the list of bookmarks for about 15 seconds, I realized that it was time to deal with this blockage. The problem was that the standard Firefox interface is completely unsuitable for such tasks. For example, if I want to move important bookmarks from the end of the list to the beginning, then I will have to drag them with the mouse for 15 seconds or more. And considering how many bookmarks I have accumulated, the whole process could take hours at this pace. The only convenient interface in this situation seemed to me to be the two-panel TC interface, and I could not find any implementations of it on the Internet. Actually, being so lazy before the dull and tedious work of dragging and dropping bookmarks with the mouse made me spend much more time on more intellectual work that will solve the problem once and for all.Why such a strange (and many would say slow) choice like ExtJS?
The fact is that the standard XUL, although fast, is extremely poor and non-extensible. For example, I needed a table whose rows may contain multiline text with different formatting for each of those lines. The Firefox bugtracker even has a task: to make table rows multiline, but it has been hanging there for many years, and it is impossible to add such support yourself. In addition, in terms of the richness of the palette of components, it is unlikely that any other library can be compared with ExtJS. Well, besides, at that moment I was just mastering it in connection with another project.Of course, ExtJS has one serious drawback, which significantly spoils life. And I'm not talking about the slowness that the developers themselves are struggling with, and with correct use which can be minimized or even hidden. I'm talking about Sencha's unspoken policy: do not release a release until a fixed (and not so insignificant) number of bugs has been added to the project, which you, as a user of the library, will have to deal with on your own. Even if you are actively writing bug reports, then you should not think that something will change with the release of the new version, because. *cm. company policy :)
However, the pros outweigh the cons.
About functionality
Almost all the functionality is visible in the screenshot. The extension is mainly intended for convenient manipulation of groups of bookmarks. I'll list some of the main points:- The work can be done entirely from the keyboard, because there are a lot of hot keys for all occasions.
- The work can only be done with the mouse, because there are drag & drop and checkboxes in each line.
- It is possible to open a group of bookmarks more conveniently than in the standard interface (because there is either one item or the entire folder).
- In addition, the behavior that has always been annoying in TC has been changed: lines are not deselected if you move to another folder; it is also possible to open the same folder in the adjacent panel as in the current one in one click.
- The extension keeps track of changes in the composition of the bookmarks and automatically synchronizes, so you do not need to follow this. In addition, due to the buffering of all changes, there are no problems or noticeable brakes when other extensions like Xmarks work.
A little about the implementation
As you know, you won't be able to directly use most JS libraries in XUL. There are some forks for jQuery etc., but it's far from stable. However, there is a way out for those extensions that do not interact with the XUL part of the interface via link libraries. You just need to create an iframe for the entire window and work with regular html and familiar JS libraries in it.For building, the Mozilla documentation suggests using make, but since I had worked with gradle before, I used it. I think that in any case it is more convenient, because you can connect standard java libraries directly in the script. In my case, I don’t even know what else could build on without writing separate utilities, because I had to do a simple replacement of SenchaCMD for the reason *see. Sencha's tacit policy.
What I wanted to ask Habr
Much to my dismay, I haven't been able to submit my extension to addons.mozilla.org for two months now. It all started with the fact that automatic tests when loading the extension fell due to the use of ExtJS. This was corrected immediately after communication with the editors. Then I waited in line for a couple of weeks and the extension was rejected because I forgot to attach the source code. Then a couple of weeks passed due to the fact that I did not immediately understand how to start the check again. My questions were not answered quickly, and the language barrier affected. Some letters remained unanswered. But this is not the point, it is clear that the editors have a lot of work to pay due attention to everyone.After the last check, I received an email with the following response:
Familiarize
Your add-on, Total bookmarks 2.2.201308201235, has been reviewed by an editor and did not meet the criteria for being hosted in our gallery.
reviewer:
Chris Maglione
Comments:
Your version was rejected because of the following problems:
1) Your add-on creates DOM nodes from HTML strings containing unsanitized data, by assigning to innerHTML, calling document.write, or through similar means. Aside from being inefficient, this is a major security risk. For more information, see developer.mozilla.org/en/XUL_School/DOM_Building_and_HTML_Insertion
2) Your add-on uses the "eval" function or Function constructor unnecessarily, which is something we normally don"t accept. There are many reasons *not* to use "eval", and also simple alternatives to using it. You can read more about it here: developer.mozilla.org/en/XUL_School/Appendix_C :_Avoid_using_eval_in_Add-ons
This version didn't pass full review because of the following issues:
1) This completely freezes my browser.
Please fix them and submit again. thank you.
This version of your add-on has been disabled. You may re-request review by addressing the editor"s comments and uploading a new version. To learn more about the review process, please visit
Every web browser comes with the ability to add bookmarks thoughbookmarks are not as popular today as they were ten years ago, but still, it would be fair to assume that most computer users usebookmarks. What bookmarks? Standard bookmarks are nothing more than links that point to a web address. Bookmarks, how The address book, only for web resources, not people or businesses.
Advanced bookmarks, the so-called bookmarks are still one form. They are a mixture of a bookmark and a small program. As a rule, they do not contain any information, but the links are stored in the folder bookmarks or from the toolbar on your computer.
Which one is the best bookmark manager? Pretty simple question. as it may seem. The answer is highly dependent on individual users. Computer users who only work on one computer and with one web browser may need nothing more than the built-in bookmark manager. Users running multiple web browsers on the same computer, or multiple computers with the same or different browser, mobile devices, or local computer access without installation or sync rights bookmarks, can install all necessary and various products.
Sometimes it may not be possible to synchronize bookmarks between various devices, and sometimes it may require the use of two programs or a workflow that requires manual steps.
Let's take a look at the built-in sync capabilities bookmarks for five web browsers Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome Opera, Internet Explorer and Safari.
Own bookmarks synchronization.
: Firefox users can use to sync bookmarks and other data between them and different Firefox profiles on the same or different computer systems. Firefox Sync is a built-in feature in Firefox 4 and is available as an add-on for Firefox 3. The data is stored on Mozilla's server or optionally on its own server.
So far, we haven't really looked at ways synchronization bookmarks in the browser on mobile devices such as iPhone, iPad or Android. They don't have sync yet. bookmarks, unfortunately. The best solution is to install a mobile web browser, for example Opera Mobile
or to sync Firefox Mobile bookmarks with a specific internet browser, or to install applications such as Chromemarks Lite, My Bookmarks App or Firefox Home for synchronization bookmarks.
The best solution depends a lot on the browsers used on the desktop computer and mobile devices. There is no service that synchronizes everything bookmarks.
Two-stage synchronization: sometimes it is necessary set up synchronization in two steps, which mainly contains tools for synchronization bookmarks from one computer or device to another application, which can then sync data from the target device. Let's say you want to sync Internet Explorer or Safari favorite bookmarks with iPad or iPhone. You can't do it directly, you won't find an app that supports this feature. But you can set it up as an intermediary.
Another option is applications that are usually available only for a specific operating system. comes like free version for Windows PC can, for example, convert Transmute Bookmarks between web browsers and even mobile devices. Paid version adds sync so that you can automatically sync bookmarks between web browsers and Android devices.
Verdict.
There is no one way that fits all solutions. I've created a small Excel document with links and information about being able to sync across browsers and devices.
The table has many gaps and I ask for your help to fill them with information.
The number of Internet users is growing day by day, in proportion to their number, the demand for various universal and convenient programs for work. A wonderful thing is the bookmark manager, which ensures the preservation, management, synchronization, as well as quick access to a very large number of favorite tabs.
But, far from always, the built-in browser manager can satisfy the needs of a demanding user, and of course there are many different reasons for this. In the quick review below, we'll take a look at pros and cons various built-in, free and paid services.
Built-in dispatchers
Almost all popular search engines have a built-in bookmark manager or link cataloger that can satisfy, let's say, an amateur housewife's set of tabs. Consider the functionality of dispatchers of popular browsers.
Google Chrome
Tabs in Google search are separated from tabs saved in the service " Google Bookmarks". This is where the inconvenience lies. this method. As long as you use your search engine on your device, you will never notice any inconvenience, but if you use someone else's computer, say at a party, you will not get access to your link base.
Login to dispatcher There are two ways: through the menu, as well as the hot key combination "Ctrl + Shift + O".
Otherwise, the bookmarks manager is very user-friendly and simple and does not pose a problem for any level of user. Give a chance save, edit, organize and delete links. You can also freely customize the import and export of links or a whole folder with favorites from other browsers. Quick access to bookmarks is organized on the panel under the search bar, which is functionally convenient. Built-in tools let you do everything desired operations without involving additional software.
Yandex and Opera
In principle, two very similar browser extensions in which the dispatcher view is focused on a visual preview. There is a spectacular express panel where you can add your favorite pages or websites, all saved links smoothly move to the Piggy Bank on the quick access page. AT Opera browser there is a synchronization of tabs, so you can access your link base from any computer, tablet, smartphone connected to the network. 
You can get into the dispatcher in two convenient ways, both using the interface through the menu, and using the hot keys "Ctrl + Shift + B". 
Very convenient, understandable and clear interface search engine Yandex, lets you quickly understand how to save, manage, and delete tabs. 
Edge browser and Internet Explorer
The Edge search engine has undergone some practical changes in its latest building Windows 10, functionality has been added pinning bookmarks in the browser bar, as well as in the Start menu tile. To put it bluntly, not a very convenient, but rational solution. However, performing some common tasks, such as importing and exporting tabs, can cause some problems.
What can not be said about Internet Explorer - just an ideal candidate for importing and exporting bookmarks from files. To save the link, you just need to click on the star at the end of the query string, select a folder to save and add. All saved links in Explorer and Edge, unlike other browsers, are in the "Favorites" section. This section is located in the top menu of the toolbar, which can be docked if necessary.
Mozilla Firefox
The search engine has a fairly good built-in tool that allows you not only to save and manage tabs, but also, if desired, offers the possibility of a qualitative improvement, for example, adding a visual component. For this, it is provided free add-on
- ViewMarks, providing high-quality creation, editing and management of images of the user's choice. In general, good support for multitasking and grouping bookmarks for themselves. 
You can manage bookmarks, create new folders, subfolders, and perform various sorting and deleting functions using the drop-down list " Control» in the left upper corner"Libraries". The entrance is carried out through the menu item or using the hot keys "Ctrl + Shift + B".
The only disadvantage of the built-in dispatchers is that after the update, new versions of browsers bring some significant changes to the look of the built-in tools. Naturally, developers strive to improve the functionality, but these improvements raise controversial issues among users. Changes have their own obvious benefits , and shortcomings, in connection with which some users ask to return the old look of the built-in tools or start looking for additional convenient programs.
Best Program Managers
No extra time and effort wasted searching for bookmarks in different browsers- all you need to do is select and install the appropriate functional utility. If you are forced to use several search engines for work and business, then you will have an overview of the best and most convenient services. Now all your important and necessary bookmarks will be available in any browser extension, on any computer, laptop, smartphone or tablet.
comparison table the best managers
| Service | Price | Advantages |
| Atavi You can register on the official website of the service https://atavi.com/ |
|
|
| Linkman The software is Russified, latest version can be downloaded at http://soft.mydiv.net/win/download-linkman.html |
Service is free |
|
| V7 Bookmarks Service in English language https://addons.opera.com/en/extensions/details/v7-bookmarks/?=en |
Free sidebar extension for Opera browser |
|
| session manager The free add-on can be installed from the Chrome Web Store https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/session-manager/ |
Free tool for Firefox browser |
|
| TransmutePro 2.04 It is better to download the licensed version from the developer's site http://www.darqsoft.com/ |
Shareware |
|
| raindrop The software can be downloaded from http://www.softportal.com/software-39527-raindrop.html |
|
|
| Evernote 6.11.2.7027 Download Russian version here https://ru.vessoft.com/software/windows/download/evernote |
|
A powerful utility that allows you to create maximum notes, save a huge number of bookmarks and web pages.
|
In fact, on the Internet you can find hundreds of interesting, convenient and functional utilities both free and paid. We tried to present you the most portable, versatile and effective bookmark managers from the rating of web users reviews. Naturally, the final choice always remains with the user, it is up to you to decide which utility to choose.
In a person leading an active network life, sooner or later, an extensive collection of bookmarks for interesting web pages is collected in the browser. Such archives, if you do not regularly clean them up, inevitably turn into real dumps, where it is very, very difficult to find a link. There is a task - there is a solution, and there are special programs - bookmark managers designed to work on a local machine, but over time, online bookmark storage services also appeared. Such resources have attractive sides. Firstly, such archives are not tied to one computer, they are available anytime and anywhere, there would be Internet access. They are especially convenient for people who, on duty, sit at one or another PC, are indispensable for those who often visit Internet cafes or other institutions for the collective use of the Network.
Secondly, online services serve as a backup storage for your data: valuable links will not be lost with an untimely gone hard drive or a lost compact. Not every home user can afford daily data backup, which is mandatory for most serious web services. Thirdly, among such resources there is a unique subclass - the so-called social bookmark managers. They are focused on the formation of communities and the active exchange of links between users. These peculiar hybrids of a web directory, a blog and a search engine allow the inhabitant of the Internet to significantly expand their horizons and get acquainted with a mass of useful, hand-picked links.
There are a lot of online data storage services today, there are plenty to choose from. If you don't like one, another will do. It is only important to immediately determine the criteria.
Since the vast majority of contenders for the title of the best SMZ (social bookmark manager) are of foreign origin, when preparing this review, services that do not work correctly with Cyrillic when creating bookmarks or when importing them from various sources were eliminated in the first place. In the semi-final, services that cannot import bookmarks from browsers were eliminated. Agree, it's a shame to lose the information acquired over the years of surfing. At that stage, services that were attractive in terms of functionality, such as Connotea and SiteULike, were unfortunately deleted from the list. Then we analyzed the user policy of the site, the speed and stability of its work.
Tell me, who needs a service whose owners do not hesitate to admit that the transfer of personal information of the client and the information collected by him to a third party is a normal practice for them and, in general, the main way to earn money? Useless and periodically inaccessible site, in addition, issuing failure after failure. When evaluating the social bookmarking manager, the presence of a more or less decent user community around it was additionally taken into account. Of course, only free resources were included in the final list: with the current competition in this area, in order to pay money for storing bookmarks, very good reasons are needed, which a private user usually does not have.
In general, online bookmark managers are arranged in the same way. First, the user creates an account on the resource. Some projects also offer their own toolbars for popular browsers (usually Firefox and Internet Explorer), providing quick access to the service's functions. Adding new links on almost all sites can be done in several modes: either directly on the site, or through a form in a pop-up window during web surfing. In the second case, you can send information about an interesting web page to the server without closing it. Such a window is called using a pre-installed browser add-on.
For this mechanism to work, it usually requires additional setting firewall or other means blocking pop-up. The user interface, sorting tools, additional features - that's where the developers let their imagination run wild. When considering services, special attention was paid to precisely such highlights that highlight best services from competitors.
To go!
Review online managers bookmarks, let's start with simpler resources. Their main task is to store bookmarks. Social functions are either absent or available, but as an optional appendage.
For privacy lovers, it makes sense to pay attention to the Connectedy manager http://connectedy.com/. Complete and final triumph of anonymity. When registering an account, you are not asked for any personal information at all. Of the services included in the final list, only for Connectedy, specifying an e-mail in the account settings is optional: if you want, tell it so that the system can remind you forgotten password.
Bookmark files are imported from Internet browsers Explorer and Firefox. The manager understands Russian perfectly, and there are no difficulties with recognizing encodings. The interface is emphatically strict: only a list is shown on the page existing folders and bookmarks from open to this moment directory. From the additional - a bookmark search bar, a menu for sorting and editing open records.
Links are distributed into folders (possibly nested). Each catalog corresponds to a separate category, which also serves to search for materials suitable for it from other users. The resource supports the exchange of links between users, but this is clearly not his forte. Connectedy - good anonymous service, designed specifically for online storage of personal bookmarks.
The online manager “Yandex.Bookmarks” http://zakladki.yandex.ru/ is arranged in approximately the same way. In order to use it, you need to go through the registration procedure on Yandex and get a virtual passport. The manager can take bookmarks from Internet Explorer and Mozilla / Firefox. Importing links from any web page you specify is useful. This method of adding bookmarks saves a lot of time, it is even strange that this service is not very widespread. You can import bookmarks either in the root directory of your private storage on the server, or in a subfolder (there is no folder, so create it directly during the import). There are thematic folders for sorting links.
The interface of the manager is simple and clear. The resource page is divided into two parts: on the left - a hierarchical folder tree, on the right - a list of entries and buttons for creating a new folder or bookmark, for editing or deleting items marked in the list. An automatic check of the functionality of the links you saved is available.
A new bookmark is added to the list either directly on the service website or through Yandex.Bar. Since this is a personal manager in its purest form, there are no tools for sharing your bookmarks or sharing data with other people. The only way extract data from the system - export it to an HTML file, and then drag it into the browser's bookmarks list.
Very pleasant service without any frills. Thanks to the original and full support of the Russian language, it stands out from the host of imported Vikings. If you already use Yandex services and just want to save your bookmarks online, the manager will suit you. Just do not forget to visit the site at least occasionally: if you have not visited it for more than a year, all your data will be ruthlessly deleted.
Curious user interface experiments are being done at MyLinkVault http://mylinkvault.com/ . This is still a very young resource, however, it has its own interesting features. The fact is that the complete Drag-n-Drop reigns on its pages: any elements, whether they are separate links or folders, can be completely safely dragged with the mouse, like shortcuts on the “Desktop”. Double clicking on an object opens a dialog for editing its properties. Drop-down menus are widely used to work with the collection. You are free to customize appearance each folder - change the color and font of the title, as well as the way links are sorted and other parameters of the directory.
Otherwise, MyLinkVault is a traditional online bookmark manager. Links are quickly and seamlessly imported from Internet Explorer, Mozilla / Firefox, Opera and Safari browsers.
MyLinkVault definitely has the makings of a social manager, but they haven't developed into true talent. So far, it all comes down to viewing a list of fresh links that have entered the system. In the settings there is a filter that allows only bookmarks to certain languages, and in the list of available there is also Russian. Thus, if your collection is not very large and you want your links to be always visible, pay attention to MyLinkVault.
social checkers
Social bookmarking managers are special products, and not without reason they are referred to as the Web 2.0 generation. A special charm of such a service is given by the rich opportunities for exchanging information in the resource community.
One of the pioneers in this field is Del.icio.us http://del.icio.us/ . It was his administration that proposed a basic set of functions that became the unwritten standard for services in this category and, at the same time, the object of discussion.
A separate topic is the mechanism of joint work of users of the resource. Socialization turned out to be radical: the links added to the system become public by default and are available to anyone. Some people don't like this approach, but your links are fair - bookmarked by the entire Del.icio.us community. Users are really forte del.icio.us. The audience of the project today is perhaps larger than that of others similar to it. That is why there are really a lot of links circulating in the system.
To organize a URL collection on Del.icio.us, tags are used (instead of familiar folders). There is no limit to the number of tags for one link. True, each tag should consist of one word. Tags that describe the file format are automatically added to saved links. Tags that are similar in meaning can be combined into groups (Tag Bundles), which allows you to correctly classify the collected links.
In addition to the traditional form filling and importing bookmarks from the browser, Del.icio.us also has original options for adding links. The service client has the right to take any link stored on the resource into its collection and assign its own tags to it. It's very easy thanks to the internal search engine. Due to the initial publicity of links in the system, you can search not only for links with certain tags, but also links owned by specific users. Moreover, it is possible to issue a kind of subscription to freshly received “urls” corresponding to a specific topic, or to track bookmarks collected by certain representatives of the service audience.
The Del.icio.us user's "desktop" is quite simple: a list of personal links in chronological order, as well as a tags panel that can be sorted according to various criteria. The Tag Clouds tool detects which tags you access the most and highlights them in the general list (with a special color or large font) so you can quickly find your favorite categories.
An interesting feature of http://del.icio.us/ is the ability to quickly navigate through the resource using specially compiled links. So, for example, to find all links posted by the user user, just type “del.icio.us/user” in the browser address bar, and to see all links marked with a specific tag, type “del.icio.us/
<нужный тег>". Complex requests are also accepted: “del.icio.us/user/<тег1+тег2>". Other features include searching by file type. Request “del.icio.us/tag/system:
filetype:avi" searches for links to videos in AVI format.
Another find of the Del.icio.us developers is the widespread use of RSS technology for data export. The content for the respective channels is generated based on a pre-composed request to the system and is updated twice an hour. In addition, Del.icio.us offers a number of "spare parts" (including Link Rolls and Tag Rolls) that may be of interest to webmasters and site owners. They are essentially news feeds that run on JavaScript and display either a simple list of recent links to Del.icio.us, or a list of bookmarks tagged with specific tags. Such a tape is easy to put on the site. Del.icio.us competitors quickly picked up the idea. RSS is now a must for most serious social bookmarkers.
A large community is a strong trump card, which is not so easy to beat. However, the conceptual focus on link exchange and social features is not for everyone. Besides, Del.icio.us can no longer be called an independent project. In December 2005, this resource with all the giblets and collected bookmarks was bought by Yahoo!, which so far promises to keep the service in the form in which it has become familiar to the audience.
Catch up and overtake!
Many people did not like the new status of http://del.icio.us/, and soon several free clones of Del.icio.us appeared. For a while, the De.lirio.us resource was notable, positioning itself precisely as an independent alternative to Del.icio.us. In June 2006, he moved to a new site under the name Simpy http://www.simpy.com/ , with De.lirio.us customer information being migrated to Simpy. In general, the service has become a typical social bookmark manager. In addition to public bookmarks, you can create private bookmarks on it, visible only to you. One of the interesting features of Simpy is the automatic assignment of tags to new links based on analysis of the content of the original web pages. In fairness, we note that in relation to Russian-language sites, this mechanism does not always work accurately. In general, you should not completely rely on automation.
It quickly became clear that it was difficult to achieve success simply by copying a successful project. The second wave of social bookmarking managers is characterized by the expansion of the functionality of services and experiments with the user interface.
The Spurl service name http://spurl.com/ stands for “special URLs” (Special URLs). Spurl is easy to link to your Del.icio.us account: if this option is enabled, all links you save through Spurl are automatically added to your collection at http://del.icio.us/ . Thus, you can use two resources at once through a single interface. Import bookmarks from browsers at a height, note good support various platforms: Internet Explorer and Mozilla / Firefox, as well as Opera and Safari. With Spurl, instead of importing the entire bookmark file from your browser, you can choose which sections or even which links should be uploaded to the server. At the same stage, you will be prompted to determine which links will become public and which will remain private.
You will also be asked to mark materials (if you have any) that should not be shown to minors: based on this data, the “family” filter of the service will then work. Adding a new link in the regular mode is done through a browser pop-up window, moreover, its screenshot is automatically attached to the page description. The sorting of bookmarks on Spurl is thoughtful: you can both distribute them into folders and apply tags.
The system analyzes the tags you use and after a while automatically starts suggesting fresh links on related topics. (You can view them on the Discover tab.) Like its venerable competitors, Spurl supports the creation of custom RSS feeds. Such data is provided in XML and ATOM formats or via JavaScript.
Another good online bookmark manager is Blinklist http://www.blinklist.com/. It was opened quite recently, and it has many interesting features. An interesting division into private links that are only available to you, public links that are visible to all customers of the service, and links that are open to a limited group of your friends. There is a standard import of bookmarks from a browser (Mozilla / Firefox or Internet Explorer), but you can transfer your links from Spurl and Del.icio.us online resources to Blinklist.
The interface of Blinklist is nice: adding and editing links is fast, numerous panels are at hand. Since all this economy revolves on AJAX, the speed of the resource is high, despite a large number of reference elements and management tools.
The basis for sorting and searching for bookmarks is tags and groups of tags. Note that the tags in the description are not separated by spaces, as on Del.icio.us, but by commas, so that if necessary, you can use key phrases. Blinklist has a developed rating system: the user assigns ratings to his bookmarks and tags (thus forming the “Favorites” section). This greatly facilitates navigation through a large collection of links. Is on Blinklist and own search system A that supports the use of basic logical operators. Autocomplete works in the search bar when typing tags from your collection.
Because Blinklist is a social manager, you can share your bookmark list with other site visitors. The analysis of the tags used by users allows you to search for "interest groups" - users who keep bookmarks on topics of interest to you.
To do this, use the Watchlists tool. Moreover, you have access to a list of people who are interested in your bookmarks. Among additional tools Blinklist is also worth noting Quick Tag Access, which speeds up searching through a large database of bookmarks, as well as Related Tag Clouds, which suggests which tags have already been used in conjunction with the one you just entered. It's very handy when you're having a hard time choosing. keywords when describing a new link.
By viewing the public links of other Blinklist users, you can rate them and save them to your own archive. And you don't have to waste time adding your tags right away. We used the Quick Blink function, copied the bookmarks in the background - and that's it, return to them in your free time.
Like other social bookmarking managers, in Blinklist you can create an RSS feed for your website or blog based on your collection. Firefox lovers also have access to original way data extraction from Blinklist - automatic synchronization of online bookmarks with local browser bookmarks. Enable the Live Bookmarking option in your account properties, and each time a new link is added to your collection, it will be automatically dumped into a local file Firefox bookmarks. Blinklist also offers its own start page- Quick Start, which shows your favorite bookmarks and favorite tags, as well as a list of resources you frequently visit.
Well, the developers of Blinklist turned out to be a decent service with rich functionality. It remains only to wish him to quickly acquire a good user community.
Tags vs. folders
To sort links in online bookmark managers, subject folders and tags are used. With folders, everything is clear: first, the necessary directories are created, in which links are then saved. It turns out a strict structure, everything lies in its place. It's just that it takes a lot of time and effort to create it. And not everyone has the patience to keep it in proper condition. Tag Technology - worthy alternative this way of classifying information. Tags are keywords, verbalized associations that you have when you get to know a certain resource. This way of describing Internet sites is very easy to learn and becomes the basis for additional tools and services.
Tags also have another important advantage - flexibility. If, when using folders, one bookmark can be saved only in one specific directory, then when using tags, no one bothers you to assign exactly as many thematic labels to the link as you see fit. However, this method also has its own nuances. Since tags are placed by the most ordinary people (as a rule, without any special training), the quality of indexing is, to put it mildly, different.
Competent indexing
A full and versatile description of a resource can take a lot of time, so many are limited to one or two tags, which are not enough to fully characterize the subject of the found web page. Do not forget about the existence of synonyms: to describe a certain concept, one user will put some tags, another - others. In addition, there is a possibility of banal spelling errors. These moments significantly complicate the search for the right links. The creators of online managers are trying to improve the situation by offering various auto-completion tools for the entered tags and hints (similar keywords). This, firstly, speeds up the process, and secondly, it allows you to somehow maintain the uniformity of the applied tags.
In order to help the system with the placement of keywords - tags, it is enough to follow some simple rules indexing, developed back in the pre-Internet era. Whenever possible, try to assign the same tags to links on the same topic. For the most complete description, put tags not only on the topic of a particular page, but also with an indication of generic characteristics, generalizations (for “browsers” - “programs” and “Internet”), do not neglect synonyms and associations (“network”, “web surfing”, “standards”, etc.). These rules are especially relevant for owners of really large collections of bookmarks.
Alexey Kutovenko
